On this page we outline a proposed timeline for the roll out of a nuclear energy plan as shown in the following figure – A Nuclear energy Transition for the NEM 2023–2060. This is the optimum RP6 scenario.
On this previous page Analysing Our Electrical Energy Options we established that nuclear energy is our lowest cost, ultra low carbon option for the National Electricity Market –
With the election of the current government in May 2025, electrical energy policy is assumed to follow the objectives of the Australian Energy Marketing Operator’s (AEMO’s) Integrated System Plan (ISP) (Progressive Change option). Analysis by Nuclear for Climate Australia using Electric Power Consulting’s Energy Model shows that this will lead to more expensive electricity in the long term. It will also be a system whose carbon emissions are five times higher on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) basis than a system that incorporates significant amounts of nuclear energy.
The goal of a renewables only electricity system is now recognised as unachievable in the foreseeable future. This leads to the inevitable reliance on gas to fill in the gaps in renewable generation and to stabilise the system. it is therefore time to again consider the role of nuclear in bringing down both the cost and the emissions footprint of the power system.
The assumed NEM load in 2050 is 260 TWh/yr and in 2060 is 300 TWh/yr. This approximates to the AEMO Progressive Change Scenario and is based on anticipated population growth plus electrification of our motor vehicle fleet and increased industrial electrification.
In the following Figure 1 we compare population growth with electricity demand and the growth in nuclear energy from our modelling. This shows the first nuclear energy to be available after 2039. Load and population match each other and the population growth is taken from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The nuclear generation curve is taken from the Nuclear for Climate’s RP6 Energy plan with first nuclear energy being produced from a 300MW small nuclear plant likely located in South Australia. Note that this analysis applies only to the National Electricity Market (NEM) and does not include the Western Australia SWIS or any other Western Australian loads.
Figure 1 – Population matched to electricity demand and increase in nuclear output
In response to the current government’s wind and solar expansion policy it is assumed that the wind and solar resources planned through to 2030 will be built, i.e. three years of the current term plus a two-year overhang of contractually approved projects. These resources are taken from the 2024 AEMO Progressive Change Scenario for 2030. After that, utility solar increases modestly through to 2045 to match the introduction of nuclear energy and storage. These resources are then modelled in ten model runs covering 2023, 2024, 2030, 2035, 2039, 2040, 2045, 2050, 2055 and 2060.
The results of the modelling are shown in Figure 4 – Energy Output from modelled years. The mix of generator capacity and storage power capacity is shown in Figure 3 – Generation and Storage power Capacity values in the RP6 plan. Note that while the installed “nameplate” capacity of nuclear energy shown in green in Figure 3 is small compared to wind and solar the impact of its output as shown in Figure 4 is huge. This leads to a grid with ultra-low carbon emissions, low system cost and a tiny environmental footprint
Relevant parameters are:A proposed timeline
Figure 2 – Generation and Storage power Capacity values in the RP6 plan
Legend: WRT – With Respect to Time, P/Store – Pumped Storage, LV – Low Voltage, HV – High Voltage, CCG – Combined Cycle Gas generator, OCG – Open Cycle Gas generator, R/T Solar – Roof Top Solar, Solar UT – Utility Solar
Figure 3 – Energy Output from modelled years
Legend: GW – Gigawatts, VRE – Variable Renewable Energy, LCA – Life Cycle Analysis, TWh/yr – Terawatt Hours per year,
The nuclear energy plan evolves to achieve in 2050 and 2060 a mix of renewables and nuclear energy in the following capacities and proportions
2050 2060
Nuclear 18GW 48% 24.8GW 60%
Roof Top Solar 35GW 17% 33.3GW 14%
Grid Solar 30GW 10% 22.1GW 7%
Wind 31.4GW 19% 31.4GW 14%
Hydro 7.05GW 5% 7.05GW 5%
Gas OCG 4.3GW 1% 0GW
Total Energy 260TWh 296TWh
Emissions
BFF g-CO2/kWh 4 0
LCA g-CO2/kWh 67 58
A detailed breakdown of capacities and outputs for all generators and storage devices is contained in the following Excel File
RP6 text – Capacites and Energy outputs
In the following image we see the integration of nuclear energy operating as a baseload resources together with wind, solar hydro and energy storage.
The load in this case is for ten days in a June month with a wind drought from the 20th to 24th of the month
Model output, 10 days in June with wind drought
The nuclear generators meet the baseload demand while during the day utility and domestic solar paired with storage and hydro meets the peak demands
In this three day image note the black demand curve.
We see that: