<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Beware – Pixie Dust Instead of Fair Dinkum Climate Change Policies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=16640</link>
	<description>Nuclear energy in Australia to fix global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 07:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Janet Elizabeth Forbes		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet Elizabeth Forbes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 07:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have read with great interest the article and comments I was sent today, particularly as it coincided with a short letter of mine published in the South Australian newspaper &quot;The Advertiser&quot; on this election day (18/5/19)

My letter praised the United Australia Party for being unafraid to use the word &quot; nuclear&quot; in the lead up to the election. It was refreshing to read of a group thinking and planning for a positive boost to Australia&#039;s economy whilst keeping the  ethical standards expected in this era of high angst for the future of our planet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read with great interest the article and comments I was sent today, particularly as it coincided with a short letter of mine published in the South Australian newspaper &#8220;The Advertiser&#8221; on this election day (18/5/19)</p>
<p>My letter praised the United Australia Party for being unafraid to use the word &#8221; nuclear&#8221; in the lead up to the election. It was refreshing to read of a group thinking and planning for a positive boost to Australia&#8217;s economy whilst keeping the  ethical standards expected in this era of high angst for the future of our planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Parker		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6750&quot;&gt;Grant Gartrell&lt;/a&gt;.

Grant, Additionally Germany is building the Nordstream 2.0 gas pipeline - 1200 km and over 1200mm diameter to bring Putin&#039;s gas into Germany and increase fossil fuel consumption.
	Now this gas production and supply involves leaks of unburned gas such as methane, a greenhouse gas as much as 75 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. If total leaks of natural gas exceed as little as 3.5pc of overall gas volume, gas is no better than coal from a climate change perspective. Yet Russian gas from the notoriously leaky Gazprom production system has “fugitive emissions” rates of at least 5-7 per cent. The Obama administration estimated that US shale gas, in contrast, involves leaks of only about 1.5 per cent.
https://www.ft.com/content/3edd0b08-9bf5-11e8-9702-5946bae86e6d

Germany will continue to import French nuclear electricity however their electricity exports are now increasing due to random overproduction due to the variability of wind and solar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6750">Grant Gartrell</a>.</p>
<p>Grant, Additionally Germany is building the Nordstream 2.0 gas pipeline &#8211; 1200 km and over 1200mm diameter to bring Putin&#8217;s gas into Germany and increase fossil fuel consumption.<br />
	Now this gas production and supply involves leaks of unburned gas such as methane, a greenhouse gas as much as 75 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. If total leaks of natural gas exceed as little as 3.5pc of overall gas volume, gas is no better than coal from a climate change perspective. Yet Russian gas from the notoriously leaky Gazprom production system has “fugitive emissions” rates of at least 5-7 per cent. The Obama administration estimated that US shale gas, in contrast, involves leaks of only about 1.5 per cent.<br />
<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/3edd0b08-9bf5-11e8-9702-5946bae86e6d" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ft.com/content/3edd0b08-9bf5-11e8-9702-5946bae86e6d</a></p>
<p>Germany will continue to import French nuclear electricity however their electricity exports are now increasing due to random overproduction due to the variability of wind and solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Parker		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 12:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6757&quot;&gt;Georgi Georgiev&lt;/a&gt;.

Georgi
Thanks for your comment.
Its great that you as a nuclear physicist have made these comments and we need a lot more to do the same.
It seems that the Greens in particular and the public more generally don&#039;t understand the great new future that massive energy density can bring.
I landed here in Nice yesterday and see the massive contrasts with the electrified public transport systems and low power prices due to cheap nuclear energy.
We have a LONG way to go in Australia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6757">Georgi Georgiev</a>.</p>
<p>Georgi<br />
Thanks for your comment.<br />
Its great that you as a nuclear physicist have made these comments and we need a lot more to do the same.<br />
It seems that the Greens in particular and the public more generally don&#8217;t understand the great new future that massive energy density can bring.<br />
I landed here in Nice yesterday and see the massive contrasts with the electrified public transport systems and low power prices due to cheap nuclear energy.<br />
We have a LONG way to go in Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Parker		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 01:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6762&quot;&gt;John Horton&lt;/a&gt;.

John, Thanks for your support for nuclear energy.
While out population is small, we have amongst the highest per capita emissions in the World. All middle ranking nations can play their part because it puts backbone into all International efforts.
Our nation needs to use its talents by decarbonising all sectors of our economy like steel making and transport.
If we don&#039;t start getting smart we will end up being dictated to by the technology rich countries in our region and our economic future will be very grim.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6762">John Horton</a>.</p>
<p>John, Thanks for your support for nuclear energy.<br />
While out population is small, we have amongst the highest per capita emissions in the World. All middle ranking nations can play their part because it puts backbone into all International efforts.<br />
Our nation needs to use its talents by decarbonising all sectors of our economy like steel making and transport.<br />
If we don&#8217;t start getting smart we will end up being dictated to by the technology rich countries in our region and our economic future will be very grim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Horton		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Horton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 00:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bob Parker is 100% correct. Forget the pixie dust and build nuclear power stations, just as the progressive Countries of the World have been doing for years and are continuing to do so.

A joke, carbon reduction for Australia when we have 25 Million people, with China and India some 2.5 BILLION --  Our contribution is nothing on the World stage. Wake up Australia !Go Nuclear. 

John Horton
  HARDEN NSW]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Parker is 100% correct. Forget the pixie dust and build nuclear power stations, just as the progressive Countries of the World have been doing for years and are continuing to do so.</p>
<p>A joke, carbon reduction for Australia when we have 25 Million people, with China and India some 2.5 BILLION &#8212;  Our contribution is nothing on the World stage. Wake up Australia !Go Nuclear. </p>
<p>John Horton<br />
  HARDEN NSW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Georgi Georgiev		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Georgi Georgiev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 08:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder when the Greens would grow mature enough to realize that the &quot;nuclear&quot; is not their enemy but their friend? Within the very tight dealines imposed for the substasubstantial reduction of CO2 emissions the nuclear option is the only one, which relies on a well established and proven technology, that can do the job. Anything else would be relying on some better future technologies would do a miracle. Unfortunately we do not have the time for hoping and dreaming about, or even developing, those future technologies - we have to react NOW!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when the Greens would grow mature enough to realize that the &#8220;nuclear&#8221; is not their enemy but their friend? Within the very tight dealines imposed for the substasubstantial reduction of CO2 emissions the nuclear option is the only one, which relies on a well established and proven technology, that can do the job. Anything else would be relying on some better future technologies would do a miracle. Unfortunately we do not have the time for hoping and dreaming about, or even developing, those future technologies &#8211; we have to react NOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Parker		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 08:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tony,
I suggest you read Mike Shellenberger&#039;s original but much longer piece in Forbes.
It may have something to do with post war redemption. Then there&#039;s the Lebensraum notion. There seems to be a lot going on with German political history and the environment though I haven&#039;t followed it up enough to be knowledgeable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,<br />
I suggest you read Mike Shellenberger&#8217;s original but much longer piece in Forbes.<br />
It may have something to do with post war redemption. Then there&#8217;s the Lebensraum notion. There seems to be a lot going on with German political history and the environment though I haven&#8217;t followed it up enough to be knowledgeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 06:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Corrected spelling:

The key words in this global mess are:
&quot;.... renewables can’t power modern civilization is because they were never meant to. One interesting question is why anybody ever thought they could.&quot;

Green insanity has driven this to the point where nations are and will be faced with bankruptcy.

The purpose of solar wind is NOT to be connected to a distribution network due to the transient, unpredictable and variable nature of nature itself. 

The practical purpose for &#039;renewables&#039; is to relieve the load on the grid system by developing means to collect and store energy in places remote from the grid - NOT to replace or bolster baseload and topping generation that drives the grid.

Transient politicians in concert with the UN that seeks it&#039;s first permanent income stream - peddle the Green agenda because the novelty made them look good ...... after all, they were doing the honourable thing by being seen to be saving the planet.  Nobody could question and the cause became a religion.

Engineers and those rational people who prefer dealing with fact and reality were and are dismissed and derided by the righteous.

And here we are - In a Federal duopoly we MUST vote for those idiots instead of rounding them up to be thrown into Jail for what they have done, let alone what they WILL do.

The religion is one of madness - especially so when considering that modern Nuclear can power the entire world for more then 500 years by feeding off existing decommissioned nuclear warheads - something that really would make us all safer and increase the living standards of practically everybody on the planet.

Instead, the Green zealots infect mature and immature minds to the point where ignorant, well-meaning children are brought to tears of desperation.  Indoctrinated by Green lies in a so-called &quot;Education&quot; system, and spread by leftist, sensationalist media, all of which has us on the path to destruction.

Is wrist slashing the only next step, or should we all wait and enjoy the circus whilst selling popcorn from the sidelines as we watch the nation die? 

I honestly can&#039;t see another solution as the idiots have a firm grasp on our destiny.
PC]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected spelling:</p>
<p>The key words in this global mess are:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;. renewables can’t power modern civilization is because they were never meant to. One interesting question is why anybody ever thought they could.&#8221;</p>
<p>Green insanity has driven this to the point where nations are and will be faced with bankruptcy.</p>
<p>The purpose of solar wind is NOT to be connected to a distribution network due to the transient, unpredictable and variable nature of nature itself. </p>
<p>The practical purpose for &#8216;renewables&#8217; is to relieve the load on the grid system by developing means to collect and store energy in places remote from the grid &#8211; NOT to replace or bolster baseload and topping generation that drives the grid.</p>
<p>Transient politicians in concert with the UN that seeks it&#8217;s first permanent income stream &#8211; peddle the Green agenda because the novelty made them look good &#8230;&#8230; after all, they were doing the honourable thing by being seen to be saving the planet.  Nobody could question and the cause became a religion.</p>
<p>Engineers and those rational people who prefer dealing with fact and reality were and are dismissed and derided by the righteous.</p>
<p>And here we are &#8211; In a Federal duopoly we MUST vote for those idiots instead of rounding them up to be thrown into Jail for what they have done, let alone what they WILL do.</p>
<p>The religion is one of madness &#8211; especially so when considering that modern Nuclear can power the entire world for more then 500 years by feeding off existing decommissioned nuclear warheads &#8211; something that really would make us all safer and increase the living standards of practically everybody on the planet.</p>
<p>Instead, the Green zealots infect mature and immature minds to the point where ignorant, well-meaning children are brought to tears of desperation.  Indoctrinated by Green lies in a so-called &#8220;Education&#8221; system, and spread by leftist, sensationalist media, all of which has us on the path to destruction.</p>
<p>Is wrist slashing the only next step, or should we all wait and enjoy the circus whilst selling popcorn from the sidelines as we watch the nation die? </p>
<p>I honestly can&#8217;t see another solution as the idiots have a firm grasp on our destiny.<br />
PC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Higson		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Higson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 01:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some say that we should have a diverse mix of energy generation technologies that includes renewables and nuclear power. I wonder! I can see that renewables might compete with SMRs for areas that are remote from a grid. Also, designers of new buildings anywhere should consider roof top solar hot water systems and solar-PV to run air conditioners. In all such cases, it should be advisory and subsidy-free, not compulsory. Apart from that, I cannot see any case at all for use of solar and wind power. And there are significant objections, e.g. on environmental grounds. I am sure that there will be plenty of jobs and business opportunities whatever choices are made. And any energy industry must have proper regulation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some say that we should have a diverse mix of energy generation technologies that includes renewables and nuclear power. I wonder! I can see that renewables might compete with SMRs for areas that are remote from a grid. Also, designers of new buildings anywhere should consider roof top solar hot water systems and solar-PV to run air conditioners. In all such cases, it should be advisory and subsidy-free, not compulsory. Apart from that, I cannot see any case at all for use of solar and wind power. And there are significant objections, e.g. on environmental grounds. I am sure that there will be plenty of jobs and business opportunities whatever choices are made. And any energy industry must have proper regulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Grant Gartrell		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2019/05/10/16640/#comment-6750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Gartrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16640#comment-6750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The English translation of the der Spiegel article is very interesting and is far better than nothing, but is almost on par with my workshop manuals for Chinese equipment written in chinglish. 

My crude, back of the envelope sums for developing enough lithium based batteries to convert the current world&#039;s vehicle fleet to electric, suggested that at the present global rate of production of lithium we should have mined a sufficient quantity (for today&#039;s vehicles) in about 1800 years. Maybe we have other plans.

I note that Germany is yet to shut down its last nuclear power station, Neckarwestheim 2. I understand that they will still continue to import significant quantities of relatively cheap, and approximately two thirds nuclear generated, power from France. Am I missing something or is that a bit like having your (yellow?) cake and eating it, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English translation of the der Spiegel article is very interesting and is far better than nothing, but is almost on par with my workshop manuals for Chinese equipment written in chinglish. </p>
<p>My crude, back of the envelope sums for developing enough lithium based batteries to convert the current world&#8217;s vehicle fleet to electric, suggested that at the present global rate of production of lithium we should have mined a sufficient quantity (for today&#8217;s vehicles) in about 1800 years. Maybe we have other plans.</p>
<p>I note that Germany is yet to shut down its last nuclear power station, Neckarwestheim 2. I understand that they will still continue to import significant quantities of relatively cheap, and approximately two thirds nuclear generated, power from France. Am I missing something or is that a bit like having your (yellow?) cake and eating it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
