<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Government Gag on Finkel&#8217;s NEM Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2017/07/03/government-gag-on-finkels-nem-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2017/07/03/government-gag-on-finkels-nem-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=government-gag-on-finkels-nem-review</link>
	<description>Nuclear energy in Australia to fix global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 01:58:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Thorne		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2017/07/03/government-gag-on-finkels-nem-review/#comment-1067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Thorne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16447#comment-1067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Philip&#039;s comments are welcome on this NEM review and hope they are conveyed to Dr Finkel for his consideration. I am sure there will be other responses to this review that may influence the governments decisions on the power industry. Emphase should made that the nuclear power station will be built to provide continuous  base load power for industry and domestic use. It is important to design and build these plants in Australia to achieve national security, technical expertise and jobs in their construction. This is a nation building venture and meeting our climate change reduction targets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip&#8217;s comments are welcome on this NEM review and hope they are conveyed to Dr Finkel for his consideration. I am sure there will be other responses to this review that may influence the governments decisions on the power industry. Emphase should made that the nuclear power station will be built to provide continuous  base load power for industry and domestic use. It is important to design and build these plants in Australia to achieve national security, technical expertise and jobs in their construction. This is a nation building venture and meeting our climate change reduction targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.R. Fredsall		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2017/07/03/government-gag-on-finkels-nem-review/#comment-1066</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.R. Fredsall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16447#comment-1066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I see nothing unusual about Dr Finkel&#039;s review.  He wrote the report at the request of the government, and provided a report that was acceptable to the government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see nothing unusual about Dr Finkel&#8217;s review.  He wrote the report at the request of the government, and provided a report that was acceptable to the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Perry		</title>
		<link>https://nuclearforclimate.com.au/2017/07/03/government-gag-on-finkels-nem-review/#comment-1052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearforclimate.com.au/?p=16447#comment-1052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Philip Walker&#039;s note should be forwarded to both major parties and the Greens for their response and comment as to why nuclear was left out of the Review. The media should also be sent a copy of Philip&#039;s note in order that this omission will be brought out into the public arena.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Walker&#8217;s note should be forwarded to both major parties and the Greens for their response and comment as to why nuclear was left out of the Review. The media should also be sent a copy of Philip&#8217;s note in order that this omission will be brought out into the public arena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
